Public preferences for water quality improvements: implications for the implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive in Scotland
The EC Water Framework Directive (WFD) sets ambitious quality targets for member state water bodies by 2015. The provisions are being transposed predominantly using a cost-effectiveness criterion, which raises questions about the relative balance of costs [of reaching good status (GS)] and corresponding (non-)market benefits or the economic efficiency of the legislation. This study provides an insight into public perceptions of water quality improvements based on an application of national characterisation data on the state of the water environment in Scotland. A choice experiment approach is used to quantify non-market benefits of achieving GS across Scottish rivers and lochs over varying timescales and different geographical levels, with the aim of revealing willingness-to-pay data that is specifically relevant for WFD implementation. We find that the benefits of implementing the WFD are substantial. Results show that geographical differences in preferences for national improvements in the river and loch water quality in Scotland exist, both in terms of magnitudes of benefit estimates and time preferences for improvements. These differences need to be taken into account in analyses at the river basin district or national level in order to support policy options for the implementation of the WFD across the country.
Journal Title/Title of Proceedings
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Downie IS; Foster GN; Coulson JC; Whitfield DP (1998)
Cole LJ; Brocklehurst S; McCracken DI; Harrison W; Robertson D (2012)1. Riparian field margins (i.e. fenced off areas adjacent to watercourses) are becoming widespread in the UK as a means of mitigating diffuse pollution in intensive grasslands. By providing additional habitats for wildlife, ...
Root morphology and water transport of Pistacia lentiscus seedlings under contrasting water supply: a test of the pipe stem theory Cortina J; Green JJ; Baddeley JA; Watson CA (2008)