Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoran Den_US
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod Men_US
dc.contributor.authorWall Een_US
dc.contributor.authorEory Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorMcVittie Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorBarnes APen_US
dc.contributor.authorRees RMen_US
dc.contributor.authorTopp CFEen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoxey Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-11T15:07:23Z
dc.date.available2013-09-11T15:07:23Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.citation62:1
dc.identifier.other12874en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11262/8001
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00268.xen_US
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses the challenge of developing a ‘bottom-up’ marginal abatement cost curve (MACC) for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from UK agriculture. An MACC illustrates the costs of specific crop, soil and livestock abatement measures against a ‘business as usual’ scenario. The results indicate that in 2022 under a specific policy scenario, around 5.38 Mt CO2 equivalent (e) could be abated at negative or zero cost. A further 17% of agricultural GHG emissions (7.85 Mt CO2e) could be abated at a lower unit cost than the UK Government’s 2022 shadow price of carbon [£34 (tCO2e)−1]. The article discusses a range of methodological hurdles that complicate cost-effectiveness appraisal of abatement in agriculture relative to other sectors.
dc.relation.isformatof12874.pdfen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Agricultural Economicsen_US
dc.subjectClimate changeen
dc.subjectMarginal abatement costsen
dc.subjectAgriculturalen
dc.titleMarginal abatement cost curves for UK agricultural greenhouse gas emissionsen_US
dc.extent.pageNumbers93en_US
dc.extent.pageNumbers118en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record