Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCanozzi MEAen
dc.contributor.authorMederos Aen
dc.contributor.authorTurner SPen
dc.contributor.authorManteca Xen
dc.contributor.authorMcManus Cen
dc.contributor.authorMenegassi SROen
dc.contributor.authorBarcellos JOJen
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-18T10:46:01Z
dc.date.available2018-07-18T10:46:01Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11262/11484
dc.description.abstractDehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting seven studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), average daily gain (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions.en
dc.description.sponsorshipScottish Government RESAS Strategic Research Programme (RD2.2.8; SD1,2,4)en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.isformatof14897en
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Production Scienceen
dc.rightsCopyright © CSIRO Publishing 2018 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by CSIRO Publishing. The final published version is available online: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752
dc.subjectAnimal analgesicsen
dc.subjectAnimal painen
dc.subjectAnimal welfareen
dc.subjectCattleen
dc.titleDehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle - a meta analysisen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.description.versionAccepted manuscript
rioxxterms.publicationdate2018-05-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-04-11
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.dateDeposit2018-07-18
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.versionAMen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record